Quick take
Map a topic • Follow citation chains • Surface “similar works” • Share collections
Research Rabbit offers AI-assisted discovery and visualization for academic papers. Build collections, map citation networks, and track new work without drowning in tabs.
Map a topic • Follow citation chains • Surface “similar works” • Share collections
Students • Researchers • Analysts • New-domain onboarding
Coverage varies by source; not a substitute for systematic review • You still need to read the PDFs
Research Rabbit is a literature discovery and mapping app for academics and analysts. You seed it with a paper, author, or topic, and it builds interactive graphs of citations, co-citations, and author networks so you can see the “neighborhood” around a work. It surfaces earlier and later papers, clusters themes over time, and lets you curate collections for export to reference managers. Exports to BibTeX/RIS/CSV make it easy to move from exploration to writing. It integrates with Zotero/Mendeley/EndNote and supports public share links for reading lists.
After extensive use in multiple research projects and collaborative reviews, Research Rabbit proves to be a genuinely helpful bridge between discovery and organization. The system performs well when seeded with strong, representative papers—it maps out the surrounding network in a way that feels intuitive, showing which works are central and which orbit in related but distinct clusters. In testing, we used it to explore emerging subfields like multimodal reasoning and sustainability AI, and it consistently surfaced previously overlooked but relevant citations. The interactive graph, with its animated cluster views, allows a researcher to see both the genealogy of ideas and the diffusion of new methods over time. Even when compared with Connected Papers and Litmaps, Research Rabbit stands out for how quickly it translates relational data into an understandable map. It’s particularly useful in early‑stage scoping, where the goal is to move fast from curiosity to a working reading corpus.
Research Rabbit’s value grows when integrated into a structured workflow. During evaluation we paired it with Zotero for annotation and citation management and with shared Notion boards for summarization. The export to BibTeX and RIS remains smooth, and its shareable collections made team onboarding much faster: new members could visually see the thematic landscape before reading deeply. The collaborative mode, where several contributors build and tag collections together, proved powerful in multidisciplinary teams—it supported simultaneous discovery without collision or redundancy. We also noted that its recommendation engine improves as collections mature, which means periodic curation and renaming of clusters is essential to keep suggestions relevant. The best results came from maintaining a clear naming convention and pruning weakly related entries regularly, creating a living, evolving literature map.
Research Rabbit’s coverage is still limited by what is indexed and by the timeliness of citation updates. Some newer conference proceedings, preprints, or paywalled papers may not appear immediately, so researchers should still cross‑reference results with Google Scholar, Semantic Scholar, or publisher databases for completeness. The algorithm can over‑emphasize highly cited clusters, potentially reinforcing existing bias rather than surfacing contrarian or novel perspectives. Critical reading remains essential. In collaborative environments, privacy settings should be reviewed carefully—collections can be shared publicly by default if not adjusted. We recommend keeping sensitive or unpublished reference sets private and using exports for long‑term storage. Despite these constraints, Research Rabbit has matured into one of the most efficient visual discovery systems for mapping literature. It accelerates understanding without oversimplifying scholarship, provided it’s used as a complement to—not a replacement for—expert discernment.
We like Research Rabbit because it turns citation relationships into a working map that teams can share and improves the conversation around what to read next. We do not like the occasional bias toward popular clusters that can hide quieter lines of inquiry. It could be better with per collection controls that emphasize novelty or methodological diversity and with clearer signals when a suggestion is driven by author overlap rather than topical proximity. What stands out is the way shared collections shorten onboarding for new teammates since the structure of a field is visible at a glance. Security posture is standard for a scholarly tool, yet sensitive research should keep private notes outside the platform and maintain exports under institutional policy. Research Rabbit is for labs, graduate seminars, product research groups, and independent scholars who want discovery that feels guided rather than random. Its strength is collaborative curation anchored in visual context. Its weakness is coverage variability that still requires expert judgment.
none
Reported in academia
Referenced in library research guides and methods courses; frequently used to kick off systematic and scoping reviews.
The free plan provides full access to literature mapping, citation visualization, and collection sharing for individual researchers. Some advanced collaboration options, larger private collection quotas, and higher daily fetch limits are restricted to avoid server load. Core discovery, export (BibTeX, RIS, CSV), and timeline browsing remain fully usable without payment.
Future premium or institutional plans are expected to include expanded collection sizes, team management tools, analytics dashboards showing citation trends, and API-style integrations with reference managers or institutional repositories. Enhanced update frequency, bulk export, and private collaboration workspaces may also be offered to universities and labs seeking managed environments.
Widely recommended in library guides and grad communities for fast scoping and citation-network views; common pairing with Zotero for writing workflow.
Compared to Connected Papers or Litmaps, Research Rabbit emphasizes interactive cluster timelines and quick earlier/later surfacing, with smooth exports to citation managers for writing.
Free/Paid: Freemium
Pricing: Paid ~$20/month View →Streamline contract review and management with AI
Pricing: Offers tiered pricing plans for individuals, small teams, and enterprises, with custom quotes available for larger organizations. View →
Free/Paid: Free
Pricing: Free View →
AI literature review assistant for faster reading
Pricing: Free trial + paid plans View →
Free/Paid: Free
Pricing: Freemium (Or ~$20/month Pro) View →Automate meeting notes and summaries
Pricing: Offers a free tier with limited minutes, and paid plans for more transcription time and advanced features. View →Create internal business applications easily
Pricing: Included with G Suite Business and Enterprise editions; specific pricing varied by plan. View details →Automate code quality and security checks
Pricing: Free tier available; paid plans offer advanced features and team collaboration starting at $10/month. View details →Code, collaborate, and deploy instantly
Pricing: Offers a free tier with paid plans starting at $7/month for enhanced features and resources. View details →