Submit new AI tool
Research Tools Literature Review Visualization

Research Rabbit Research Rabbit interface screenshot

Research Rabbit offers AI-assisted discovery and visualization for academic papers. Build collections, map citation networks, and track new work without drowning in tabs.

Pricing: Free Forever API: No Rating: 4.30 Updated: 1 month ago
Ideal forGraduate researchers, PIs, and analysts doing lit reviews.
Workflow stageSurvey / scoping / synthesis
Watch forFree plan; library/collection caps may apply

Quick info about Research Rabbit

Quick take

Map a topic • Follow citation chains • Surface “similar works” • Share collections

Good for

Students • Researchers • Analysts • New-domain onboarding

Watch-outs

Coverage varies by source; not a substitute for systematic review • You still need to read the PDFs

Is this the right AI tool for you?

0 / 500

Where Research Rabbit shines

Research Rabbit is a literature discovery and mapping app for academics and analysts. You seed it with a paper, author, or topic, and it builds interactive graphs of citations, co-citations, and author networks so you can see the “neighborhood” around a work. It surfaces earlier and later papers, clusters themes over time, and lets you curate collections for export to reference managers. Exports to BibTeX/RIS/CSV make it easy to move from exploration to writing. It integrates with Zotero/Mendeley/EndNote and supports public share links for reading lists.

Common use cases:
• Map a research area from a single seminal paper and identify adjacent subfields
• Find “bridge” papers that connect two clusters (hidden influencers)
• Track new papers entering a cluster over time for living reviews and grant updates
• Build a teachable reading list for a course module with public share links
• Audit a manuscript’s related work section by checking co-citation neighborhoods
• Export a curated set to a reference manager for annotation and drafting
Practical insights and discovery performance

After extensive use in multiple research projects and collaborative reviews, Research Rabbit proves to be a genuinely helpful bridge between discovery and organization. The system performs well when seeded with strong, representative papers—it maps out the surrounding network in a way that feels intuitive, showing which works are central and which orbit in related but distinct clusters. In testing, we used it to explore emerging subfields like multimodal reasoning and sustainability AI, and it consistently surfaced previously overlooked but relevant citations. The interactive graph, with its animated cluster views, allows a researcher to see both the genealogy of ideas and the diffusion of new methods over time. Even when compared with Connected Papers and Litmaps, Research Rabbit stands out for how quickly it translates relational data into an understandable map. It’s particularly useful in early‑stage scoping, where the goal is to move fast from curiosity to a working reading corpus.

Integration into research and collaboration workflows

Research Rabbit’s value grows when integrated into a structured workflow. During evaluation we paired it with Zotero for annotation and citation management and with shared Notion boards for summarization. The export to BibTeX and RIS remains smooth, and its shareable collections made team onboarding much faster: new members could visually see the thematic landscape before reading deeply. The collaborative mode, where several contributors build and tag collections together, proved powerful in multidisciplinary teams—it supported simultaneous discovery without collision or redundancy. We also noted that its recommendation engine improves as collections mature, which means periodic curation and renaming of clusters is essential to keep suggestions relevant. The best results came from maintaining a clear naming convention and pruning weakly related entries regularly, creating a living, evolving literature map.

Limitations, data gaps, and responsible use

Research Rabbit’s coverage is still limited by what is indexed and by the timeliness of citation updates. Some newer conference proceedings, preprints, or paywalled papers may not appear immediately, so researchers should still cross‑reference results with Google Scholar, Semantic Scholar, or publisher databases for completeness. The algorithm can over‑emphasize highly cited clusters, potentially reinforcing existing bias rather than surfacing contrarian or novel perspectives. Critical reading remains essential. In collaborative environments, privacy settings should be reviewed carefully—collections can be shared publicly by default if not adjusted. We recommend keeping sensitive or unpublished reference sets private and using exports for long‑term storage. Despite these constraints, Research Rabbit has matured into one of the most efficient visual discovery systems for mapping literature. It accelerates understanding without oversimplifying scholarship, provided it’s used as a complement to—not a replacement for—expert discernment.

Our assessment of Research Rabbit for mapping a field with collaborators

We like Research Rabbit because it turns citation relationships into a working map that teams can share and improves the conversation around what to read next. We do not like the occasional bias toward popular clusters that can hide quieter lines of inquiry. It could be better with per collection controls that emphasize novelty or methodological diversity and with clearer signals when a suggestion is driven by author overlap rather than topical proximity. What stands out is the way shared collections shorten onboarding for new teammates since the structure of a field is visible at a glance. Security posture is standard for a scholarly tool, yet sensitive research should keep private notes outside the platform and maintain exports under institutional policy. Research Rabbit is for labs, graduate seminars, product research groups, and independent scholars who want discovery that feels guided rather than random. Its strength is collaborative curation anchored in visual context. Its weakness is coverage variability that still requires expert judgment.

Our verdict:
Research Rabbit is an effective companion for building and sharing a reading map. Use it to expand from seeds, maintain clean collections, and pair suggestions with close reading before you write or decide.

At a glance

ic_fluent_system_24_filled Created with Sketch. Platforms

Web

API

none

Integrations

ZoteroMendeleyEndNotepublic collection links

Export formats

BibTeX (.bib)RIS (.ris)CSV (.csv)

Coverage & data

Sources

  • Publisher and index metadata via scholarly databases
  • citation/co-citation graphs
  • crowd curation via user collections.

Coverage

Moderate

Update frequency

Weekly

Academic adoption

Reported in academia

Referenced in library research guides and methods courses; frequently used to kick off systematic and scoping reviews.

Plans & limits

Free plan

The free plan provides full access to literature mapping, citation visualization, and collection sharing for individual researchers. Some advanced collaboration options, larger private collection quotas, and higher daily fetch limits are restricted to avoid server load. Core discovery, export (BibTeX, RIS, CSV), and timeline browsing remain fully usable without payment.

Pro features

Future premium or institutional plans are expected to include expanded collection sizes, team management tools, analytics dashboards showing citation trends, and API-style integrations with reference managers or institutional repositories. Enhanced update frequency, bulk export, and private collaboration workspaces may also be offered to universities and labs seeking managed environments.

Community signal

Mentions

Widely recommended in library guides and grad communities for fast scoping and citation-network views; common pairing with Zotero for writing workflow.

Compared to similar tools

Compared to Connected Papers or Litmaps, Research Rabbit emphasizes interactive cluster timelines and quick earlier/later surfacing, with smooth exports to citation managers for writing.

Similar tools teams compare

Scite card

Scite

Free/Paid: Freemium

Pricing: Paid ~$20/month View →
ClauseBase card

ClauseBase

Streamline contract review and management with AI

Pricing: Offers tiered pricing plans for individuals, small teams, and enterprises, with custom quotes available for larger organizations. View →
Semantic Scholar card

Semantic Scholar

Free/Paid: Free

Pricing: Free View →
Scholarcy card

Scholarcy

AI literature review assistant for faster reading

Pricing: Free trial + paid plans View →
Perplexity AI card

Perplexity AI

Free/Paid: Free

Pricing: Freemium (Or ~$20/month Pro) View →
Otter.ai card

Otter.ai

Automate meeting notes and summaries

Pricing: Offers a free tier with limited minutes, and paid plans for more transcription time and advanced features. View →

Trying to decide? Compare these

Google App Maker alt card

Google App Maker

Create internal business applications easily

Pricing: Included with G Suite Business and Enterprise editions; specific pricing varied by plan. View details →
Codiga alt card

Codiga

Automate code quality and security checks

Pricing: Free tier available; paid plans offer advanced features and team collaboration starting at $10/month. View details →
Replit alt card

Replit

Code, collaborate, and deploy instantly

Pricing: Offers a free tier with paid plans starting at $7/month for enhanced features and resources. View details →
Research Rabbit
Copied!