Submit new AI tool
Code Suggestions AI Tools IDE Integration

Intellicode (Visual Studio) Intellicode (Visual Studio) interface screenshot

Intellicode by Visual Studio provides AI-driven code completions and best practices.

Pricing: Free API: Not separately provided Rating: 4.50 Updated: 1 month ago
Ideal forDevelopers who live in Visual Studio/VS Code and want reliable, low-friction assistance
Workflow stageType intent ? Get ranked suggest
Watch forIDE usage limitations apply

Quick info about Intellicode (Visual Studio)

Campaign concept art

Turn mood boards into polished concept explorations ready for stakeholder review.

Product hero shots

Generate photoreal e-commerce shots with lighting and product details dialed in.

Social content variations

Spin up multiple ratios and treatments tailored to each platform's specs.

Is this the right AI tool for you?

0 / 500

Where Intellicode (Visual Studio) shines

IntelliCode is Microsoft’s AI-assisted coding in Visual Studio and VS Code. It boosts IntelliSense with smarter completions, recommends API usage based on common patterns, and helps refactor, generate code, and fix style issues. The goal is simple: write correct code faster while keeping your project’s conventions.

Common use cases:
Smarter code completions that follow common patterns
Suggest parameter orders and next lines based on context
Refactor and fix simple issues with quick actions
Infer and add missing usings/imports automatically
Assist C#, C++, Python, and more inside Visual Studio/VS Code
What Visual Studio IntelliCode adds to everyday development

Visual Studio IntelliCode augments IntelliSense with AI assisted suggestions that reflect common patterns in real projects. It examines your current file and the neighboring context, then proposes whole line completions, argument placeholders, and member selections that match the libraries you are using. IntelliCode models are trained on high quality open source repositories and on your own code if you enable team models, which makes the ranking of suggestions feel native to your solution. In practice this turns many small pauses into smooth motion. You write a clear method name or a doc comment that states intent and the assistant supplies the next few tokens or the entire call pattern that typically follows. The feature set reaches beyond typing. It nudges consistent formatting, offers quick fixes through code actions, and helps align new code with the idioms that already exist in the repository.

Where IntelliCode fits best and how teams get dependable results

IntelliCode performs best in mature solutions that follow stable conventions and rely on widely used frameworks. C Sharp, C Plus Plus, TypeScript, JavaScript, and Python benefit because examples are abundant and patterns are well understood. Teams that keep analyzers and linters active see cleaner outcomes because suggestions are immediately checked and shaped by the same rules reviewers enforce. The most efficient rhythm is simple. Describe intent in comments, accept short proposals rather than long invisible blocks, and run tests often so feedback arrives while the change is still small. When repositories opt into team completions, new hires pick up naming and layering habits more quickly because the assistant mirrors the local style. This preserves flow without weakening standards for review and testing.

Limits to expect and governance for privacy and security

An intelligent completion engine does not replace design thinking or security review. It can suggest patterns that compile but do not meet performance or safety goals. Code that touches identity, secrets, or cryptography should pass the same scrutiny it always has. Organizations should review Microsoft documentation on data handling and decide whether to enable team models based on policy. Developers should avoid placing sensitive information inside comments for the sake of steering the assistant and should keep secret scanning on by default. With these guardrails IntelliCode raises throughput on routine scaffolding while leaving ownership of quality and risk where it belongs.

Our analysis of IntelliCode for pattern aware productivity in Visual Studio

We like IntelliCode because it understands real usage patterns and shortens the distance between intent and a working call or loop. We do not like the occasional tendency to over complete into code that hides logic from the reviewer. It could improve with stronger cues that explain why a given suggestion was ranked high so developers can trust the choice without guessing. The most useful outcome is steadier momentum for everyday code while tests and reviews stay in control of correctness. Privacy posture is acceptable when team features are configured with care and when secret scanning remains active. IntelliCode is for developers who live in Visual Studio and want help that respects the project’s voice. Its strength is context sensitive completions. Its weakness is residual risk on critical paths that only human judgment and tests can mitigate.

Our verdict:
IntelliCode is a sensible accelerator inside Visual Studio. Use it to smooth routine work and keep disciplined reviews for code that carries security or performance risk.

At a glance

ic_fluent_system_24_filled Created with Sketch. Platforms

Windows (VS)Windows/macOS/Linux (VS Code)

API

public

API docs ↗

Integrations

Visual StudioVS CodeRoslyn analyzersGitHub/ Azure DevOps workflows.

Export formats

Edits applied directly in codediff/PR as usual

Coverage & data

Sources

  • Local file context
  • trained rankings from open-source usage
  • analyzers and project metadata.

Coverage

Ranking-based co

Update frequency

Frequent

Academic adoption

Reported in academia

Common in courses using Visual Studio; helps beginners see idiomatic API call orders.

Plans & limits

Free plan

Included features vary by edition and extension; most core features are free in VS/VS Code.

Ads / tracking

Yes

Community signal

Mentions

Widely used by C# and C++ developers due to deep Visual Studio integration.

Compared to similar tools

IntelliCode enhances IntelliSense with smart ranking and refactors. Copilot/Codeium generate larger blocks; Tabnine focuses on fast, private completions.

Similar tools teams compare

Replit Ghostwriter card

Replit Ghostwriter

Free/Paid: Paid add-on (Replit is free; Ghostwriter is premium)

Pricing: Freemium (Or ~$25/month) View →
Google App Maker card

Google App Maker

Create internal business applications easily

Pricing: Included with G Suite Business and Enterprise editions; specific pricing varied by plan. View →
Autocode card

Autocode

Serverless backend development and API creation.

Pricing: Offers a generous free tier for development and testing, with paid plans scaling based on usage and features. View →
CodeProphet card

CodeProphet

Streamline coding with AI assistance

Pricing: Offers a free tier with limited features and paid plans starting at $19/month for advanced capabilities and higher usage limits. View →
Prisma AI card

Prisma AI

Streamline database workflows with AI

Pricing: Free tier available with paid plans offering advanced features and enterprise solutions. View →
Prisma card

Prisma

Modern database access for Node.js

Pricing: Prisma Community Edition is free. Prisma Plus and Enterprise offer advanced features and support for teams. View →

Trying to decide? Compare these

Google App Maker alt card

Google App Maker

Create internal business applications easily

Pricing: Included with G Suite Business and Enterprise editions; specific pricing varied by plan. View details →
Codiga alt card

Codiga

Automate code quality and security checks

Pricing: Free tier available; paid plans offer advanced features and team collaboration starting at $10/month. View details →
Replit alt card

Replit

Code, collaborate, and deploy instantly

Pricing: Offers a free tier with paid plans starting at $7/month for enhanced features and resources. View details →
Intellicode (Visual Studio)
Copied!