Academic Research Data Insights AI Tools

Elicit

Elicit interface screenshot

Elicit is an AI-powered tool for conducting systematic reviews and organizing research data.

Pricing: Free basic plan (Or ~$12/month) API: Not available Rating: 4.00 Updated: 1 month ago
Ideal forStudents, analysts, product/UX researchers, and policy folks who want a fast, transparent first pass over the literature
Workflow stageQuestion ? Search & extract ? Tr
Watch forSome usage restrictions

Quick info about Elicit

What it does best

Summarizes research papers. Extracts methods and results into tables.

Where it fits in your workflow

Use it for systematic reviews and speeding up academic research.

Plans and availability

Free to use with limits. Research tier offers expanded features. No public API.

Is this the right AI tool for you?

0 / 500

Where Elicit shines

Elicit is an AI research assistant for literature review. You ask a question, and it searches academic databases, extracts key info from papers (methods, outcomes, samples), and organizes the results in a table you can sort and filter. You can quickly scan abstracts, pull out quoted evidence, and save a shortlist for deeper reading. It is built to reduce the “where do I start?” friction in evidence gathering.

Common use cases:
Find relevant papers for a research question and summarize them
Extract study details (participants, measures, interventions, outcomes)
Cluster findings and identify patterns or disagreements
Create an annotated reading list with quotes and links
Draft a structured summary with citations to review later
What Elicit helps you do during literature reviews

Elicit is a research assistant that searches academic papers, summarizes findings, and extracts key fields to speed up early stage reviews. You describe a research question, it retrieves relevant papers, and it produces concise summaries with objective statements and study details. You can add or remove results, adjust filters, and extract structured information such as population, intervention, outcome, and methodology. For many teams this replaces the first few hours of manual search and skimming and turns a sprawling query into a manageable candidate set with notes that are ready to compare.

Where Elicit is most effective and how to keep results rigorous

Elicit works well when you need to map a domain, collect representative studies, and prepare a brief that cites specific papers. It is practical for planning experiments, framing policy questions, and building evidence summaries for non technical stakeholders. Strong habits include refining the research question into precise terms, pinning must include papers, exporting tabular summaries for offline review, and reading full texts for any claim that affects a decision. When conclusions diverge, ask Elicit to surface limitations and to highlight differences in sample size, study design, and statistical power so you can explain divergence in your own words.

Limits to acknowledge and ethical handling of sources

Elicit does not guarantee comprehensive coverage and it can miss paywalled or very new studies depending on access pathways. Summaries are helpful but they cannot substitute for careful reading of methods and results. Treat the tool as an organizer and accelerator, not as an authority. Keep a record of the exact papers you rely on with links and publication metadata. For proprietary or sensitive topics, avoid placing confidential information in prompts and store your annotations in your own systems. Used with these disciplines, Elicit speeds the move from question to an evidence map while preserving the rigor that research demands.

Our view on Elicit for fast, structured evidence gathering

We like Elicit because it reduces the overhead of early stage reviews and helps teams compare studies on consistent fields. We do not like that coverage can be uneven when a topic spans multiple disciplines or when key results sit behind strict paywalls. It could be better with clearer indicators of search completeness and with per paper confidence notes tied to extraction quality. The interesting effect is how it nudges better questions by showing gaps and divergent results early. Security and ethics come down to process. Track sources, verify claims in the full text, and keep sensitive data out of prompts. Elicit is for researchers, policy analysts, clinicians in training, and product teams that need to brief quickly. Its strength is structured summarization of scholarly work. Its weakness is reliance on your follow through for depth and validation.

Our verdict:
Elicit is a practical accelerator for literature reviews. Use it to assemble candidates and structured notes, then do the careful reading that turns summaries into sound conclusions.

At a glance

ic_fluent_system_24_filled Created with Sketch. Platforms

Web

Integrations

Export to CSVlinks out to publisher pages and PDFscopy tables into docs.

Export formats

CSVcopied tablesreferences with links

Coverage & data

Sources

  • Academic search indices and PDFs
  • model-based extraction of key fields
  • user-provided questions and filters.

Coverage

Rapid evidence m

Update frequency

Frequent

Academic adoption

Reported in academia

Used in classrooms and labs to teach structured literature review and evidence synthesis basics.

Plans & limits

Free plan

Daily search/extraction limits on free tier.

Pro features

Higher limits, batch operations, and advanced extraction depending on plan.

Ads / tracking

Yes

Community signal

Mentions

Popular among researchers and analysts for rapid, citation-backed scans before deep reading.

Compared to similar tools

Elicit is a fast extractor and organizer for literature review. Consensus emphasizes “what studies say” answers; Scite focuses on citation context (supporting, disputing, mentioning).

Similar tools teams compare

Semantic Scholar card

Semantic Scholar

Free/Paid: Free

Pricing: Free View →
Updating logo

Gyana

Unlock insights, organize information, and boost productivity.

Pricing: Offers a free tier for individuals and paid plans for teams with advanced features and collaboration tools. View →
Wolfram Alpha card

Wolfram Alpha

Free/Paid: Freemium (free queries; Pro from ~$4.99/month)

Pricing: Free (Or pro from ~$9.99/month) View →
Updating logo

LectureNotes AI

Transform your lecture notes into actionable summaries.

Pricing: Offers a free tier with limited features and paid plans starting at $10/month for advanced capabilities. View →
Updating logo

Otter.ai

Automate meeting notes and summaries

Pricing: Offers a free tier with limited minutes, and paid plans for more transcription time and advanced features. View →
Research Rabbit card

Research Rabbit

Free/Paid: Free

Pricing: Free Forever View →

Trying to decide? Compare these

Updating logo

SciSpace

Streamline your research with AI

Pricing: Offers a free plan with limited features, and paid plans starting at $10/month for advanced functionalities and higher usage limits. View details →
Updating logo

NotebookLM

Summarize, analyze, and extract insights from your sources.

Pricing: NotebookLM is currently free to use, with potential future premium features. View details →
Updating logo

Grammarly

Enhance your writing with AI.

Pricing: Offers a free version with essential checks, and paid plans (Premium, Business) for advanced features and team collaboration. View details →

Recent updates

Last updated:

Elicit
Copied!